TransAnatolie Welcomes You  to TurkeyExplore Turkey via TransAnatolie Tour

 

 

 

En  Fr  De  Nl  Be  Tr

Chronology ] Catalhoyuk ] [ Sumer & Akkad ] Isin Larsa & Babylon ] Trojans ] Hattis ] Hittites ] Assyria ] Mitanni ] Carians ] Phrygia ] Urartu ] Lydia ] Medes ] Lycians ] Persians ] Hellens ] Byzantine ] Ancient Technology ] Silk Road ]
Sumer & Akkad

 

Up
Ancient Sumeria
Sumerian Timeline

 

Sumer and Sumerians, Kings of Sumer and Akkad

Mesopotamia produced one of the best-known ancient civilizations, with a literate, urban culture and highly-developed political institutions. Sumer and the Sumerians are those who contributed to the extraordinary social and technological developments in the Mesopotamia region from 3800 to 2000 BC.

A book by Samuel Noah Kramer is titled History Begins at Sumer [Doubleday Anchor, 1959]. This is true, but, as with early Egyptian history, it is a vague and frustrating kind of history, and one without the succession of hard monuments that become the signposts of time in Egypt. Sumeria was also politically fragmented into city states -- none with the concentrated power that enabled Khufu to make sure that he would never be forgotten. Here dynasties are given for Kish, Uruk, Ur, and Lagash. The early history of all these cities is mythologized in later documents. Thus, Gilgamesh might be regarded as a purely legendary figure if he did not also occur in the ordinary king lists. There is also some trouble, as in Egypt, reading the names. The obscurity of early Sumer is compounded by later misconceptions. The Biblical expression, "Ur of the Chaldees," although used by the great excavator of Ur, C. Leonard Woolley, for the title of a book about the city (Norton Library, 1965), is extremely anachronistic and misleading. Ur was originally a city of the Sumerians, not of the Chaldeans. The latter were actually Aramaeans, who did not appear in Mesopotamia until nearly a thousand years after the end of the Sumerians as a distinct linguistic community. The Chaldeans dominated Mesopotamia in the "Neo-Babylonian" Period, not only long after the Sumerians but also long after any reasonable date for Abraham -- if Abraham came from "Ur of the Chaldees," this must be a different Ur, already Aramaean in Abraham's day, or it is just applying an anarchronistic epithet to a city that later was associated with the Chaldeans. The Sumerian language itself was neither Semitic nor Indo-European, a representative of a now vanished pre-historic language family that may have also included the Elamite, Kassite, Hurrian, and Urartuan languages. Since unaffiliated languages still exist nearby in the Caucasus (e.g. Georgian), it is always possible that they were all related.

 
Dynasty I of Kish Dynasty I of Uruk
21 kings
since
the Flood
Mes-ki-
ang-sher
c.2740
Enmerkar  
Lugalbanda  
Dumuzi  
En-me-
barage-si
c.2700 Gilgamesh c.2700
Agga   Ur-nungal  
    Laba-X-IR  
Uhub c.2570 E-nun-
dara-anna
  Dynasty I of Ur Lagash
Mesilim c.2550 Mes-HE   Mes-anne-
padda
c.2560
-2525
En-hegal c.2570
Dynasty II of Kish Lugal-ki-kun c.2550 A-anne-
padda
c.2525
-2485
Lugal-shag-
engur
c.2500
Dadasig     Mes-kiag-
nunna
c.2485
-2450
Ur-Nanshe c.2490
Magalgalla     Elili c.2445 Akurgal c.2465
Kalbum     Balili   Eannatum c.2455
-2425
[2 kings]   Dynasty II of Uruk Dynasty II of Ur Enannatum I c.2425
Enbi-Ishtar c.2430 En-shakush-
anna
c.2430
-2400
Identical to Uruk II in
Roux 1964; "4 kings
(names unknown)" in
Roux 1992
Entemena c.2400
Lugal-mu   Lugal-
kinishe-dudu
c.2400 Enannatum II  
Dynasty III of Kish Lugal-kisal-si   En-entarzi  
Dynasty IV of Kish Dynasty III of Uruk     Lubalanda  
Ur-Zababa c.2340 Lugal-zage-si c.2340
-2316
    Ur-inimgina c.2350

History begins at Sumer because the Sumerians were undoubtedly the first to have a functioning system of writing. The origins of this are now plausibly explained by Denise Schmandt-Besserat (cf. Before Writing, Volume I, From Counting to Cuneiform, University of Texas Press, 1992). For purposes of accounting, contracts, shipping, etc., little clay models were made of the kinds of commodities involved. For convenience, these models were then placed in clay wrappers. Then, so that the contents of the wrappers could be known without breaking them, little drawings of the models began to put on the wrappers. Soon it became obvious that the little drawings by themselves made the models superfluous. The stylization of the models had already produced a certain abstraction and stylization in the drawings, which thus became proto-cuneiform -- a system already pre-adapted to representing numbers as well as concepts. Since thousands of the clay models have been found, the evidence for the process is abundant. No such antecedents have been found in Egypt or India, where writing began soon after the Sumerian precedent. It is hard not to conclude that Sumerian influence, with the evidence of Sumerian artifacts to prove it, sparked the development of writing in those places. Where writing developed independently elsewhere, i.e China and the New World, Middle Eastern influence via Central Asia cannot be discounted on the former, while Mayan glyphs, only recently deciphered at all, had not progressed far, even three thousand years later, beyond the most basic versions of cuneiform or hieroglyphics. Nor were even the Aztecs still using the system at that level, while the Incas had no form of writing whatsoever. The achievement of the Sumerians thus represents a unique and pivotal moment in human history.

On the other hand, the Sumerians were also doomed by history. The first chill came from the Semitic speakers, the Akkadians, who lived immediately north of them. Sargon of Akkad built the first Middle Eastern Empire, at the time of the Egyptian VI Dynasty, embracing all of Sumeria and extending far up the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. Sargon's name, Sharru-kîn, means "the king is legitimate," an almost sure sign that he wasn't -- the story of his royal birth but childhood among commoners is similar to the story of Moses in the Bible or of Karn.a in the Mahâbhârata, all of whom said they had been set adrift as infants and claimed a status opposite from what they started with.

 
Dynasty of Akkad
Sharru-kîn, Sargon 2334-2279
Rimush 2278-2270
Manishtusu 2269-2255
Narâm-Sîn 2254-2218
Shar-kalli-sharri 2217-2193
[interregnum,
Guti invasion, c.2193]
Shu-Turul 2168-2154

One of Sargon's successors also had a significant name:  Shar- kalli- sharri means "king of all kings." Shortened to just "king of kings," this became a standard title for later Assyrian and then Persian monarchs. It even survived in Modern Persian as Shâhanshâh.

An invasion of the Guti, a non-Semitic people in the Zagros, disrupted the Akkadian state and led to its downfall.
 

 
Dynasty IV of Uruk
Ur-nigina 2153-2147
Ur-gigira 2146-2141
[3 kings] 2141-2124
Dynasty V of Uruk
Utu-hegal 2223-2113
Dynasty III of Ur
Ur-Nammu 2112-2095,
revised
2018-
Shulgi 2094-2047,
revised
-1953
Amar-Sîn 2046-2038
Shu-Sîn 2037-2029
Amorites appear, c.2034
Ibbi-Sîn 2028-2004,
revised
-1911
Elamites sack Ur, c.2004
Lagash
Ur-Baba 2155-2142
Gudea 2141-2122
Ur-Ningirsu 2121-2118
Pirig-me 2117-2115
Ur-gar 2114
Nam-mahazi 2113-2111
Governors of
Lagash for Ur
Ur-Ninsuna  
Ur-Ninkimara  
Lu-kirilaza  
Ir-Nanna -2023

Sargon's empire, however, did not long survive this ambitiously named king, and it was followed by a Sumerian revival. The III Dynasty of Ur was the last brilliant moment for the Sumerians, ruling the whole country as none of the earlier dynasties had. But the set of the tide was already obvious:  The last three kings of Ur III already have names incorporating the Akkadian name of the moon god, Sîn, rather than the Sumerian name, Nanna. Sumer was being linguistically overwhelmed. But not forgotten. Sumerian civilization did not vanish, it was simply translated; but even the translators did not forget Sumerian -- it was remembered by scholars, even by Kings of Assyria, centuries after it had last been uttered in ordinary speech. Babylon and Assyria became the heirs of it all. But we are too. The process of translation continued, since our own days of the week are translations, through Latin and Greek, of the Babylonian and ultimately Sumerian names of the planets.

 

The list and dates here are from Georges Roux, Ancient Iraq [Penguin, 1966 edition and revised 1992 edition], pp. 502-504. However, it now appears that Roux's dates are about 94 years too early. In "Astronomy and the Fall of Babylon," in the July 2000 Sky & Telescope [pp.40-45], Vahe G. Gurzadyan discusses changes that can be made in Babylonian chronology on the basis of analysis of Babylonian astronomical records (the Enûma Anu Enlil) and more accurate modern calculations of ancient eclipses. Three revised dates are given above for Ur III. A key event for this period was a lunar eclipse on 27 June 1954 BC, which was thought at the time to have foretold the death of King Shulgi of Ur.

 

 

 


Kelley L. Ross, Ph.D.

  

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

Home ] Up ] Ancient Sumeria ] Sumerian Timeline ]

Mail to  info[at]transanatolie.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 1997 TransAnatolie. All rights reserved.
Last modified: 2014-08-02
 
Explore the Worlds of Ancient Anatolia and Modern Turkey by TransAnatolie Tour: Ancient Anatolia Explorer, Asia Minor Explorer, Turkey Explorer; Cultural Tour Operator, Biblical Tour Operator, Turkish Destinations, Cultural Tours to Turkey, Biblical Tours to Turkey, Health and Cultural Tours to Turkey, Thermal, Thalasso Holidays in Turkey,  Archaeological Tours to Turkey, Historical Tours to Turkey, Cultural Heritage Tours to Turkey, Cultural Tours to Turkey, Hobby Eco and Nature Tours Holidays to Turkey,  Beach and Plateau Holidays in Tuirkey, Anatolian Civilizations, Ancient Cultural Museums in Turkey, Top Turkish Museums, Museums in Turkey, Anatolian Civilizations Museum, Istanbul Archeological Museum, Ephesus Museum, Mevlana Museum, Topkapi Museum, Museum of Topkapi Palace, Turkish Cities, Turkish Destinations, Ancient Cities in Turkey, Ancient Anatolian Cities, Turkey in Brief, Turkish Culture, Turks, Turkish Language, Turkish Philosophers....Circuits culturels en Turquie, Excurcions en Turquie, Vacances en Turquie, Circuits de Culture en Turquie, Circuits de Croyance en Turquie, Turquie, Villes Antiques en Turquie, Musees en Turquie, Empires Turcs, Revolution de Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, Turquie d'Ataturk, Culturele Tours in Turkije, Rondreizen in Turkije, Reizen naar Turkije, Culturele Rondreizen naar Turkije, Vakanties in Turkije, Groepsreizen naar Turkije, Turkije, Turkse  Geschiedenis, Geschiedenis van Turkije, Oude Steden in Turkije, Oude Beschavingen, Oude Anatolische Beschavingen, Turkse Steden, Turkse Musea, Musea in Turkije, Turkse Steden, Overzicht van Turkije, Turkije in het Kort, Turks, Turkse Taal, Turkse Gescheidenis, Osmaanse Rijk, Ottamaanse Rijk, Gezondheid Tours Vakanties in Turkije, Geloof Tours in Turkije, Culturele Tour Operator, Turkije Specialist 
 
The Association of Turkish Travel Agencies